Ramesseum – The Pole Shift Theory

Some monuments correlate with a certain ancient pole, and show no signs of solstice related use. That means that it is harder to prove the antiquity that we claim. For example, if an ancient monument is oriented to one of the ancient poles, we can express this “hit” in a certain probability and therefore also the probability of the claimed age.

This probability varies between 75% and 95% depending of the location of the site. And if this monument holds more keys, like clear stone arrangements that point to solstice angles that specifically belong to another latitude, hence to the pole it is oriented to, we have found a much higher probability of its true age. We can also express this in a probability and that depends on the complexity of the stone arrangements. This has to be looked at for every specific site or monument. For that we need reliable and accurate plans of a site, study them thoroughly, perform our method in all details, and publish our conclusions.

This time we will be looking at the Ramesseum in Egypt.

The Ramesseum in the 19th Century

Fig. 1: The Ramesseum from around half of the 19th century. The site had to be excavated and this process is still going on today. The necessity of excavation is a first sign of extreme antiquity. However we do not take this into account in the classification of their true antiquity.

The Ramesseum Today

*Fig. 2: Aerial View on the Ramesseum how it looks today. Excavation of the site is still continuing and is a massive undertaking due to the scale of the site.*

Fact Sheet

Country	Egypt
Location	25.7275°N, 32.6105°E
Orientation	-45°
Pole correlation (I to V)	Yes, Pole V
Probability of Pole correlation, 1^st analysis	79.2%_[1]
Current solstice angle	±26.3°
Solstice angle Pole V	±26.2°_[2]
Solstice related constructions?	Low, the dimensions of structure B (fig. 4) correlate with solstices of Pole V. However the relations are ambiguous.
Probability of Pole correlation, 2^nd analysis	Not increased: 79.2%_[3]
Age	Between 330,000 and 345,000 BCE. Probability of the claim 79.2%.
Excavated?	Yes, ongoing process from early 19th century until today. Excavation is also a sign of extreme antiquity.

Location and Orientation

Floor Plan of Ramesseum

Fig. 4: The Ramesseum is oriented to the outer borders of Pole V. At the time the Ramesseum was built, the pillars in structure “B” might is reputed to have caused a spectacle of light and shadow. This play of light and shadows might have been a measure of time of year, but there is not enough information available to verify this “myth”. To verify the play of light and shadow in this structure, the whole structure would have to be recreated in a simulation environment. That might be a good idea for a further investigation some time in the future.

Global View on the Situation

Fig. 5: This global view shows how the orientation of the Ramesseum correlates with one of the five poles. The orientation of the monument “hits” Pole V, one of the five proven poles. The most probable age of the structure is therefor as ancient as Pole V.

[1]: In our method we have proven that a square or rectangular building can be only uniquely oriented 45° clockwise and 45° counterclockwise. From the perspective of Ramesseum’s location the probability of a coincidental orientational “hit” with one of the poles is 20.8%. That means that the probability it is intentionally related to Pole V is: 100-20.8=79.2%.

[2]: The location of Egypt is such that the pole movement pivoted around Egypt. That means that the latitude of Egypt hardly changed during the consecutive migrations of the spin axis (the geo pole). That also means that, although the cardinals have radically changed, the angle between Summer and Winter solstice hardly changed.

[3]: As we show in fig. 4 has area B a sort of solstice relation. This could be a coincidental match. The dimensions of the area might be matching, there seems to be no clear relation in the pillar arrangement. On top of that there are three other areas (A, C, D) that are not matching these solstice angle. These other three non-matches suppress the probability of the match of B back to a non-correlation. Therefor is the 2nd probability of possible solstice match not increased. The match with Pole V remains 79.2%.

https://mariobuildreps.com

Contact: buildreps@gmail.com