Earth Crust Deformations

 

We have proven sufficiently that crustal deformations have scourged ancient cultures very long time ago. Crustal deformations are the cause of highly developed civilizations to be warped back into a new Stone Age. We have identified them as lost civilizations. Note the plural. During these events that took place over many millenniums the Earth’s crust deformed very slowly causing the spin axis, as seen from the crust’s perspective, to migrate very slowly. 

Support our work and discover more:Become a Patron!

Fig. 1: Here we show in one frame the essentials of our discovery that reveals that the crust deformed significantly over the last 350,000 years. The deformations are the cause of what science has called “glaciation cycles”. | © Mario Buildreps.

 

Difficult to Imagine the Scale on Which it Took Place

It is difficult for many people to imagine that a geographic pole – the crust – can shift and deform. Mainstream science says it is impossible. They say there is no evidence. Yet, apparently it is possible and the evidence can be found everywhere but has not been properly recognized and interpreted as such.

Science interprets these crustal shifts as ice ages or glaciation cycles and claims that the latter are caused by variations in CO2. The truth is that glaciation cycles were crustal deformations and the proof is in the numbers. Most new scientific discoveries are supported by mathematics, and not just by digging somewhere in the ground or proposing wild ideas with some dubious evidence. Our animation shows certain ancient structures, spread around the world, which were selected by us to illustrate with clarity how we found and proved the locations of these ancient poles. Many more structures were involved in our precise mathematical methods to produce such proof.

 

The Older a Pole, the Higher the Uncertainties

Note that the older a pole becomes, the harder it is to validate it, and this has several reasons:

  • the older a pole, the older the structures. The older the structures, the less is left of them to clearly discern their orientation.
  • the older a pole, the more shifts the crust had to endure. The orientation of the ancient structures became less accurate, and one can see that in the size of the red dot that grows larger as the pole position gets older and less defined.
  • the larger a mathematical node (the red dot) becomes, the more structures you need to prove that pole, but these structures are very difficult to find.

These foregoing are the main reasons why the probabilities of the four former geographic poles decrease. What is clear and even stunning is the consistency of the mathematical patterns we found. All proof and evidence are pointing in the same direction – to an inevitable conclusion. Crustal shifts in the latitudinal direction are real, and they relate to glaciation cycles. Ancient structures and ancient civilizations are showing us the way.

 

Migration Routes

We have discovered based on the orientation patterns in our database that Humanoid activity has spread from the region of Peru to the region of Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize. In this specific region of Guatemala and Mexico, we see an explosion of activity. Humanoid species start to thrive here. The patterns indicate that the migration route goes further up the North through the Bering Strait, and spreads quickly over the vast Eurasian continent.

The Out-of-Africa hypothesis seems to have no real validity. Africa is vastly ignored by the ancient builders. We find hardly any ancient structures in Africa. The Northern part of Africa, above the Sahara, is the only region of Africa where we can find many ancient structures.

We will spend more attention to this topic in future publications.

 

Five Poles: Mathematically Proven

Fig. 2: Earth Crust Displacements over the last 350,000 years. The crust has shifted four times (five poles) in the latitudinal direction. Over 910 ancient structures, from pyramids, temples, massive megalithic sites to other ancient ruins are used to locate the former poles and to prove the shifting crust. This is the reason why Greenland is still covered in ice, and why it is now melting. It is also clear why ancient civilizations were lost multiple times, how the myths of the deluges came about. The volatile magnetic pole is an indicator of what is happening inside of the earth. Increasing volcano activity and increasing seismic activity over the last 200 years are all indicators that the crust is slowly becoming unstable. Our prediction indicates that the crust might become increasingly unstable within ONE millenium from now. However, before the next “wild ride” really start to take off will still take a few millennia. | © Mario Buildreps.

 

Probabilities of these Pole Positions

The positions of these poles are the result of extensive calculations and complex mathematics. The analyzed ancient structures are distributed all over the globe, very much distant from each other. The orientation of a building is defined by our method as follows: The structure can be uniquely positioned within 90 degrees regarding the current geographic pole, 45 degrees Eastward, and 45 degrees Westward.

When we process our data, we find massive nodes in an almost vertical line descending over Greenland. The probabilities of these nodes to be formed coincidentally are*:

  • Pole I (0-26 ka): 1 to 6.15×1018
  • Pole II (130-155 ka): 1 to 1.82×1020
  • Pole III (210-225 ka): 1 to 5.91×1025
  • Pole IV (240-270ka): 1 to 8.37×108
  • Pole V (330-345ka): 1 to 2.47×105

That means we can be quite certain, between 99.99996% up to 100%, that these poles (the red dots) are:

  • correctly positioned;
  • of the correct size.

The same holds true for the age of the geographic poles. The magnitude of the shifts corresponds so accurately to the temperature jumps of the glaciations graphs that we can claim a correct period with 99.99987% certainty.

Mathematics, as the Queen of Science, has shown us how to define antiquity more precisely – for the past half million years.

 

*latest data January 2019.

 

© 2015- by Mario Buildreps et al.

https://mariobuildreps.com

 

Proofreading and editing: J.B.

 

Note: To keep this website in the air and to do our research we need your support. Thank you!

 

16 Responses

  • Frank Mertens

    Civilizations only build buildings when the geographic poles are stable. There are possibly more pole positions in-between. If the theory of a pulsing earth that can grow rapidly during times of transformation is somewhat right, than that would mean that our current data of movement of the plates just represent noise of a stationary state. When I look at the proposed past pole locations I must wonder what is so special about the Antarctic plate. Is it actually the one that grows? Because that would nicely explain why it would stay stationary.

    Reply
    • Mario Buildreps

      Hi Frank, the data suggests that construction activities dropped significantly during the migration of the geographic North pole. Because the periods in between the poles is so long, it indeed seems that cultures kept on building, but at a lower pace, and oriented some of their structures to this wandering geographic pole of that time. Indeed, the Antarctic plate is special. It is the only plate that expands in all directions, and that directly explains why all the data suggests that Antarctica hardly moved its position contrary to the North pole. The earth seems to be expanding pushing around the plates in all directions. But that seems not to be the case with Antarctica. It balanced fairly stable around the spin axis over the last 500,000 years.

      Reply
  • Sandra

    Amazing article! You provide with your website unique content.

    Reply
  • Stan

    The topic has amazed me. Thank you, very nice article. Also great website, cannot stop reading.

    Reply
  • Keala

    This is an intelligent website. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind you, obviously from the responses.

    Reply
  • Irwin

    This is a great inspiring article. I am pretty much pleased with your good work. You put really very helpful information..

    Reply
  • Theron

    Thank you for such an interesting article. It’s full of insightful information and entertaining descriptions. Your point of view is the best among many.

    Reply
  • Chong

    Hi, I find reading this article a joy. It is extremely helpful and interesting and very much looking forward to reading more of your work..

    Reply
  • elCee

    FingerPrints of the God’s is a decent book that touches on these transformations. I have never believed that humans as a species were able to cause these changes in nature as we are seeing them. We only;t “see” them because we can now measure certain things.

    But we also ignore certain things. Example…peak oil….or oil was the byproduct of rotting vegetation and biomass from the past…..nonsense. The pressures inside the earth can make diamonds out of coal . It certainly can produce more oil than what we can ever use.

    Can we do better…sure we can. In fact, humans have alwys tried to evolve. This will not stop. We will make strides in nuclear and solar power generation among other things.

    But one thing is for sure. Whatever tore Africa and South America apart was not something 7 billion people could do…..ever.

    Antartica could be the key since it was not always at the south pole.

    Reply
  • Carrus

    Appreciating the hard work, time, and persistence you put into your website and in depth information you present. It’s awesome to come across a website every once in a while that isn’t the same out of old rehashed information. Great read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

    Reply
  • Lonny

    Really appreciate this information, thanks for sharing the article!

    Reply
  • Trent

    This is a great inspiring article. I am pretty much pleased with your good work. You put really very helpful information..

    Reply
  • david p McGuire

    In conjunction with commentary from Mr. Cremo (Forbidden Archaeology) I find your assertions fascinating and compelling.
    As a serious Christian I am interested more in how rather than when humans came to be the creature we are now, since whenever we began to be a dominant species, it was designed by a brilliant creator. Julie Andrews reminds me from The Sound of Music, “Nothing comes from nothing, nothing ever could….”

    Reply
    • Mario Buildreps

      Thank you for your comment, David. The how’s are probably easier to answer if the when’s are answered, or vice versa.

      Reply
    • elCee

      I wish to meet this brilliant creator on my next voyage….I have some choice questions for him…..first one will be

      What the fck were you thinking ?

      Reply
  • Vashikaran Specialist

    In fact, your website is very important and I like it in heart and always want to be with this website. I’m a Top Vashikaran Specialist Astrology and I live in Delhi

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.