Bishapur

Some monuments correlate with a certain ancient pole, and show no signs of solstice-related use. That means that it is harder to prove the antiquity that we claim. For example, if an ancient monument is oriented to one of the ancient poles, we can express this “hit” in a certain probability and therefore also the probability of the claimed age.

This probability varies between 75% and 95%, depending of the location of the site. If this monument incorporates more keys, like clear stone arrangements pointing to solstice angles that specifically belong to another latitude, hence to the pole it is oriented to, we have hereby determined a much higher probability of its true age. We can also express this in a probability and that depends on the complexity of the stone arrangements. This has to be looked at for every specific site or monument. For that we need reliable and accurate plans of a site, study them thoroughly, perform our method in all details, and publish our conclusions.

This time we will be looking at Bishapur in Iran.

Overview on an Overgrown Ancient City

Fig. 1: Bishapur is a typical ancient site of the kind that we see everywhere around the world. Walls and foundations that are overgrown by many feet of soil, which is not the result of only 2,000 years of accumulation. The process of uncovering only a small part of the entire site is stretched over two decades of hard labor. Logically, getting rid of soil is countless times faster than the process of soil coverage. Just from this point of view it is unlikely that the city is just 2,000 years old.

Fact Sheet

Country	Iran
Location	29.7798°N, 51.5761°E
Orientation	-37°
Pole correlation (I to V)	Yes, Pole V
Probability of Pole correlation, 1^st analysis	79.8%_[1]
Current solstice angle	±27.1°
Solstice angle Pole V	±24.7°_[2]
Solstice related constructions?	Yes, but not spectacularly convincing. The structural dimensions match the Pole V solstice criteria in a wide range. However, because there are so many angles in the main structure, there are also more possibilities of a coincidental match.
Probability of Pole correlation, 2^nd analysis	Increased: 89.9%_[3]
Age	Between 330,000 and 345,000 BCE. Probability of the claim 89.9%.
Excavated?	Yes. There are multiple excavation waves over the last few decades. The excavations of the site are not very well documented. Only part of the entire site is excavated.

Map of Bishapur

Pole V Solstice Relations of Bishapur

Fig. 3: There are several angles in the main structure of Bishapur that are in line with the solstice angles that only belong to Pole V. These angles made solstice measuring possible in ancient times. The probability that this is coincidence shrinks somewhat, meaning that Bishapur belongs to Pole V, around 90% certain. There are so many angles and corners that make up possible solstice relations that the correlations are not spectacularly high.

Global View on the Situation

Fig. 4: The main structure on Bishapur is oriented to high density node of Pole V. It can be an accidental hit, however the probability for that is low, around 10% if we take the ancient solstice correlations into account.

Stories of Giants, The Giant Statue of Shapur

At a distance of 6 km (4 miles) from the city of Bishapur stands the massive statue of Shapur. Do you remember the foot prints on the floor of the Ain Dara temple in Syria? This could be coincidence, however, it can be true that the biblical stories of Goliaths in a very distant past are indeed based on fact.

Both ancient monuments were oriented to a very ancient pole, namely Pole V. We have evidence, still under development, that gravity in the distant past was lower. The earth has grown in size, and gravity has increased correspondingly. However, the exact time frame of this growth is still under investigation. This lower gravity could have encouraged life on earth to grow significantly larger than today. Geology still stubbornly denies that the earth has grown, but almost everyone knows about Pangaea, right? The same evidence that Pangaea is based on, namely the expansion of the Atlantic, is denied on the other side, the Pacific. The only correct solution of this equation is expansion or growth of the earth.

Historians and archaeologists believe that they can date statues like that of Shapur with eerie precision, and point to a certain ruler. The truth is that they can’t. They base their ideas on twisted stories and falsified records. But these stories are written to show the greatness of rulers. Stone is patient. This statue can easily be many hundreds of thousand of years old.

*Fig. 5: The statue of Shapur is located at an unexpected place, a cave. Despite the many unscientific claims and stories, nobody knows how old this statue really is and who created it.*

[1]: In our method we have proven that a square or rectangular building can be only uniquely oriented 45° clockwise and 45° counterclockwise. From the perspective of Bishapur’s location, the probability of a coincidental orientational “hit” with one of the poles is 20.2%. That means that the probability that it is intentionally related to Pole V is: 100-20.2=79.8%.

[2]: The distance between the location of Pole V and the location of Bishapur results in a different solstice angle from what it is today. This means that according to our method, this Pole V solstice angle should be checked with key dimensions of the structure. Our verification results in a positive answer: the Pole V solstice angles match approximately with the temple dimensions. The Pole V solstice is calculated from the ancient latitude with the formula: asin(sin(tilt spin axis)÷cos(latitude)) = asin(sin(23.5)÷cos(18.1)) = 24.7°±10%. There is around 10% room for error. This could mean that the temple was used also as a measuring device for seasons and time, and it strengthens the claim that the temple was built during Pole V. The probability for the temple to match coincidentally, within a 10% margin of error, the Pole V solstices is somewhat increased by a factor of 2.

[3]: The probability for a coincidental Pole V match is 20.2%. The probability for a coincidental solstice match is 50.0%. There are many matches to make with the Pole V solstice. This is why the probability of 50% is relatively low if we compare with other sites or temples. The set of coincidences must be combined: 20.2% × 50% = 0.202 × 0.5 = 0.101 = 0.1 = 10%. The probability that Bishapur matches Pole V criteria, including a solstice relation, is 100-10 = 90.0%. The probability that Bishapur is NOT between 330,000 and 345,000 old is 10%.

https://mariobuildreps.com

Contact: buildreps@gmail.com

The Pole Shift Theory