Welcome to my website!
My name is Mario Buildreps, a pen-name for a former businessperson who is also a graduate engineer. I have always been fascinated by ancient humans, megalithic structures, ancient temples, and pyramids. Already as a child, I wondered why ancient Homo sapiens (and still do), who had the same brains and hands as we do, seemed to do nothing with their creative potential for hundreds of thousands of years. I discovered that this idea of primitive humans in the ancient past is not true.
Using my engineering and mathematical skills, I uncovered a remarkable pattern in the orientation of foundations of ancient structures around the world. This pattern reveals a hidden history of our planet and our civilization that goes back much further than conventional archaeology and geology suggest. This website is dedicated to sharing this groundbreaking discovery with you.
I am supported by a dedicated and highly skilled team of mainly betas.
We are a team of independent researchers who have penetrated deeply into the stunning truth behind ancient Lost Civilizations. Our research is holistic and mathematical, covering several scientific disciplines.
Our recent discoveries, done entirely outside the conventional scientific community, reveal astounding insights into the reasons for geographic polar movements and their undeniable close association with ancient cultures.
Our ancient history, including a vast amount of ancient structures, goes back literally hundreds of thousands of years. That is not just an idle statement because a large amount of data and mathematical certainties support it. It appears that the dating work that was done by archaeologists, scholars, and historians over many decades has revealed next to nothing about the REAL antiquity of human history.
Support our work and discover more:Become a Patron!
This Idea Is An Important Inspiration For Me
Why We Only Need Mathematics
Everything is made of the same basic elements: atoms, with electrons, protons, and neutrons orbiting a nucleus. But if we zoom in even further, we find only vibrations – waveforms – that are essentially mathematical.
I am concinced that everything is ultimately mathematical, and that we can express anything mathematically, although that seems impossible in many cases. This is not just true for Quantum Mechanics or General Relativity, but also for our origin and our history. Unfortunately, our education often prevents us from seeing the truth in these mathematical statements. We are taught that mathematics is just a tool, an abstract tool to get answers. Our senses cannot perceive the invisible reality that underlies everything we call matter. We lack organs to discern intangible truth. That is why we are so attached to empiricism and materialism.
Here is a reality check: Why does every successful scientific theory have mathematics at its core? Could it be because the underlying reality itself is mathematical? What else could it be?
If we follow the path of mathematics, we unlock the most astounding truths of life. That is what our research is all about: unlocking our consciousness by showing the reality of things that science, religions, education, parenting, and politics have ignored for too long.
My book, which is now in the making, will reveal many things:
- the true age of ancient structures;
- the true age and origin of what we call Homo sapiens;
- the codes encrypted in many pyramids like Giza and Teotihuacan, and where and what they point to;
- the mathematical relations between pyramids, temples, and dolmens around the world;
- why and how civilizations were “lost” multiple times;
- mathematical proof that ice ages were earth crust shifts and were the cause of the disappearance of past highly developed civilizations;
- a scientific explanation of the cause of earth crust shifts.
Many people feel that there is something wrong with the current scientific paradigm, and since science tells them what to think, they are trapped in a dilemma. Science seems untouchable but might change dramatically over time. If you keep believing in the old “scientific” paradigms, you end up dismissing the power of mathematics, and indirectly denying pure mathematical models, such as quantum mechanics, as being true. In other words, our belief system (and that means all of us) needs a serious upgrade.
My book will unlock and clarify many subjects that so many people want to understand. The conclusions are fully math-based and yet, it will be accessible for everyone.
Feel free to comment or to ask me questions
© 2015 – by Mario Buildreps
Proofreading and editing: J.B.
Contact: buildreps@gmail.com
52 Responses
Hi Mario,
When Google Earth was first released to the public, I became a cyber traveler and explored the world and its many wonders. I am fascinated with the work of our ancestors but noticed a very clear difference between the architecture of ancient temples in the Abya Yalan continent compare to the rest of the world. I thought Jour sharing my thoughts but wanted to ask where can I publish an article with my observations?
I will appreciate your help.
Best, JFEM
Hi Juan, you an send it first by e-mail buildreps@gmail.com
Thank you, Mario
hi mario
fantastisch onderzoek. bij deze een tip die hand in hand lijkt te gaan met de expanding earth / zijnde het concept van primary water. met name dat water aangemaakt wordt in de aardkorst / meer info on > http://www.primarywaterinstitute.org/ – zelf deel ik ook al jaren heel intens je interesse in de oudheid, dit sedert de start van mijn eerste expeditie te hawara, labyrint van egypte. mvg, louis de cordier
Interessant en dank je wel Louis.:)
Hi,
Just wondering if you guys were across the Chan Thomas theory about why the earth’s poles change position — it wasn’t crustal displacement, it was basically that there’s a solar micronova every 12000 years, which more or less flips the planet over.
There’s a team of astrophysicists who have pulled together as much evidence as they can to support this hypothesis, and what might be really powerful is if you guys engaged with them to compare notes.
They’re proper scientists and so I am sure you would have a productive time comparing notes.
Check out https://suspicious0bservers.org/ and they have a youtube channel as well that goes over scientific journals, etc.
Hi Greg, thank you for your suggestion. Yes, we know about Chan Thomas’ theory. We see often researches that adopt one theory, as the ultimate holy grail, and throw all the rest of possibilities overboard. Crustal deformations are effectively proven by means of our our method with a probability of 99,6%. The most probable cause is the growing earth (growing in mass, growing in size). Micronovas and/or CMEs are probably mixed in the events, and are difficult to filter out as a separate event.
Mario – I am a fan of your work and your “low key” presentation of the material on YouTube, etc. It’s fascinating data and theory to study and consider. I am writing just to say I’m glad to see you corresponding online. It appeared (to me) that you may have been offline for awhile whether for health or other reasons and I’m glad to see you online and engaged with your supporters. I look forward in anticipation to seeing more great work from you and your team. Be well and please keep educating us! -Chris
Hi Chris, thank you for your mental support!
I came across a site that I’m sure will be decoded by your team.
Rujum Al-Hiri
N – 23 – 54′ 27.36″
E – 35 – 48′ 7.2″
Looks like a very ancient Stonehenge
Hi Peter, indeed Rujm el-Hiri has been decoded by us. Thanks.
Dears , thx so much , for Yours mindblowing Research , shared Your pages as much as possible , sended an e – mail with Google Earth snapshots perhaps interesting related ancient “Buckminster like” phi – archeogeography ( yin , yang , balance icosahedral spherical vectoring ) ; for correlations in Google Earth , many overlays ancient sites are vailable by regions worldwide , and by type of megalithic structure , Megalithic Portal ( maps on website also interactive online ) : downloads for 5 geographic systems ! ! select KML ( html ) for Google Earth positional overlays , with dynamic links to sites webpages from within Google Earth while scrolling ! https://www.megalithic.co.uk/topics.php?countries=1&kmldown=1 . Amitiés de Bruxelles near Paris ( added below obsolete website , – 10 year on preferred authors i readed ; switched to specialized FBgroups ( + 10.000 members ) https://www.facebook.com/groups/791622274195042 and Paper.Li ( # multimedia , free archives 5th year online ) #KeysitestoSacredPatterns , weblink https://paper.li/KeystoSacredPatterns#/ …. professional multimedia i sponsor , e – co – redactors worldwide possible … ??? today the e – journal is free )
( Dear , update , i m mapping in Google Earth https://mariobuildreps.com/pole-v-monuments/ : the first 10 are astonishing on vectors Buckminster – Hagens phi grid of Padang of which i sended You image Google Earth snapshots of main node points worldwide via a recent e – mail. Kish and Ur are also on a major crossing ? I map further falling each time under my desk from astonishment for first ten random choose between Your list. This grid is Galactic SP axe oriented ? It is based on the Basil Petrov mathematical ancient great circle decision table of Geolines Rusia , major node point before the Inca coast. That team is anonymous , since Basil Petrov left and actualy decided to stay time unlimited unknown. The major node point near India Pyramid Somapura / Padang pyramids was converted in Buckminster – Hagens phi grid , full unified vectoring grid ( UVG ) , You can test the Google Earth overlay Yourself by download from FB file : labeled PetrovMerid… https://www.facebook.com/groups/1295386420476634/files )
Geolines webpage , math major worldsites leyline decision table : https://geolines.ru/eng/publications/HISTORIC-GEODESY/HISTORIC-GEODESY_217.html
Somapura Pyramid – Temple : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somapura_Mahavihara ( ancient India, Bangladesh today )
Update 2 : Dear sended image via Your e- mail ( second mail send on buildreps@gmail.com ) ; Can’t send Google Earth images in this website replies , so one example attached in e – mail for Kish and Los Cancajos as key nodes , Buckminster Balanced !!! phi grid vectoring Padang pyramids Indonesia ( 10 year online ,even on websites Indonesia : Gunung Padang site or Java Pyramids was syncronized with Galactic Center ? | Bayt al-Hikmah Institute (wordpress.com)
: https://ahmadsamantho.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/my-correspondence-with-dr-hugo-kennes-on-earth-grid-at-gunung-padang-pyramids/ Amitiés de Bruxelles , à Votre Service HK
One image says more than 1000 words ( Chineese maxime )
Major Key pole 5 sites , Kish / Ur , Gran Canaria , Tiwanaku , ancient phi Unified Vectoring Grids Hagens/Buckmister ( Balance great circles , green ) , cubic : yellow ; foto – links ( + 10 year online ) repeated : https://www.facebook.com/groups/791622274195042 :
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3449908305094894&set=pcb.4006761702681067
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3449908571761534&set=pcb.4006761702681067
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3449908771761514&set=pcb.4006761702681067
rest of the world
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3427397217346003&set=pcb.3981961835161054
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3427397957345929&set=pcb.3981961835161054
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3427398380679220&set=pcb.3981961835161054
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=3427399710679087&set=pcb.3981961835161054
Greetings from Brussels
I find your work fascinating and reasonable.
That being said, I find it somewhat troubling that you label current climate science as pseudoscience and only beneficial to politicians – eerily similar to the Trump administrations departure from truth in favor of chaos via ‘fake news’.
Moving on, what do you say about the writings of Manetho, who wrote of the history of Egypt as starting about 36,766 BC, as wells as the importance Egypt placed on Sirius and the Sothic calendar? Also, are you familiar with the work of Armando Mei who assets that the Giza monuments match the astrology of 36,500 and is the true Zep Tepi?
Hi Sam, thank you for the compliment. Our claims about climate science are not similar to what Trumpists are claiming. You might want to study this article to get a deeper insight into the patterns. Climate science has not made this puzzle yet, which I find alarming, probably due to the way funds are allocated, and so does CS not yet understand that the balance is much quicker restored when CO2 levels drop due to government regulations. The balance seems to be in the atmosphere itself and not in the whole ecosystem.
Writings of ancient philosophers are mostly very interesting, however, they lack often a scientific basis. I do not believe one can pinpoint a whole empire or a whole nation on the year precise, especially such a long time ago. Tales and stories are not scientific, only mathematics or mathematical based experiments are scientific, so I wouldn’t put too much value on it.
As for Armando Mei, he is probably a good guy, but by claiming such things he does seem not realize the following. If Giza would be so old, it could never be so very precisely oriented to the cardinals. Not even by the current standards of geology, i.e., the very slow moving and rotating plates. The plate on which Giza is located, very close to the border of the African plate, is subjected to serious movements and rotations. Giza cannot be older than some 16,000 years, and are probably one the crown achievements of the human species so far.
Mario,
Great videos! You may find some ideas in this presentation – https://youtu.be/TjNJujkwN84
Hi – I’m new to all this, and fascinating work, but how have you ruled out that axial tilt cycle and/or precessional cycles of the Earth are not factors that might account for the movement of what is perceived to be True North, and hence that these might be younger structures than proposed? I understand that if measured accurately, the actual orientation of True North relative to the temples’ location would not move over time from the effects of these Milankovitch Cycles, but perhaps if the ancients were using a tradition of a particular Pole star, or the angle/movement of the sun on the Earth, to determine the direction of North, then might this account for the shift over time?
Hi Jack, thank you for your comment. You can browse through the FAQ section to look for answers. The probability that orientation patterns of 51% of the globally distributed ancient structures cross a small region that also matches the sequence of the ice ages is close to zero. There is no chance, like you suggest, that our ancestors might had a tradition to orient their structures to a particular star. To some obscure miniscule point in the sky? Or to our Sun? What is the most likely answer even if it goes against all parroted paradigms? There is a global tradition to orient important structures cardinally, not all, but of all orientation preferences is this by far the number one. Apparently, what we prefer today, preferred our ancestors as well.
Thanks for this. I guess I was wondering what method was used by the ancients to determine North, i.e. whether it was using the stars, or whether using an ‘Indian circle’ method on the ground with a ‘gnomon’, and how each of these might be affected by precession. I understand that the movement of the Sun on an equinox day is not affected by precessionary effects, but that the equinox date is affected.
I found an interesting article below, suggesting that in order for the gnomon method to be accurate, one needs to carry out the measurement on a solstice day, as otherwise the changing declination of the sun during the day may cause the high point of its arc as it travels through the sky to deviate from the north-south axis. However, to determine the equinox date it might be that the ancients used relationships between the stars and the sun; there is evidence in the Egyptian ceiling decoration of Senmut that this was the case.
http://archaeopoject.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/46946175/MIsler%252520ancient%252520directions.pdf
“This may explain the inscriptions at Edfu and Dendera that Zaba found puzzling: two different methods described to determine the north-south orientation, one being quite precise (observation of the stars) and the other (observation of the shadow of the sun) less so. They may have not been different methods to determine the orientation at all. Rather, one method (observation of the stars) may have been used to signal the proper time of year to undertake the orientation process (observation of the shadow
of the sun) … Over an extended period of time this orientation method might have been adversely affected by another celestial cycle – precession.”
Although the author draws the conclusion that this would have limited effect on Egyptian pyramid-building as it lasted only a few hundred years, in the context of thousands of years of pre-history, with sites globally, I was just wondering whether you had looked into whether there might be any accounting for your orientation data from the shifting precessional relationships between the Sun, the background stars and the date of the equinoxes.
I will in any case read more on your FAQs and look forward to your book. I find the whole thing fascinating and congratulate you on the work done; I will try to understand more about the geological points regarding the sequence of the ice ages, although a lot goes a bit over my head at the moment!
Thanks
Is it possible to come and visit your office as I will be in Holland this next weekend – are you free either Friday 26th or Monday 29th? If so- can you tell me where you are located?
I’m interested in discussing a potential research project with you that builds on your database of pyramids globally.
I’m particularly interested in putting a date of construction on all these pyramids to see if a consistent pattern emerges.
Please let me know if you’re interested before I fly on 24th April,
Thanks again
Dr Julian E Salt
When measuring all the ancient structures, are all your deviations calculated from magnetic north or true north? Ie Are you correcting all compass measurements by google earth or some other method, as you show in some of your videos? It seems many folks confuse the two (magnetic and true north) and the two vary greatly and likely independly . It would seem to me that the ancients (probably not even using magnetic north) most likely used true north in all building orientation -but that modern folks using a compass to make on ground observations could easily be trusting blindly in their compass readings , oblivious to stellar and true north orientation. Please comment. I am truly fascinated by your research and believe you are onto an amazing synthesis of information advancing the understanding of all of human history. If your information is all based on true north orientation it is phenomenal. If only I had the means to travel all over the world to see for myself. Alas I must trust the eyes of others.
Thank you for your comment, Arthur. All deviations are related to True North. Most people indeed confuse magnetic and True North, probably not even knowing the difference between the two. Solar, Lunar, and astronomical positions are all related to True North. Magnetic North has only value for navigational purposes. It is speculative to assume if ancient peoples were aware of magnetic North, or not.
AWESOME!
I’ve thought for many years that conventional archaeology was mistaken in its analyses. I’ve seen too many examples in museums around the world where the interpretations looked like nonsense and that there was clearly more technological knowledge apparent in the artifacts, but that it just didn’t fit their timeline model. So glad to have found you, which was just luck because I was checking on the age of Gobleki Tepe during a conversation. I look forward to reading your website in detail and examine your mathematical model. Happy to help edit and contribute. We’ll run an episode of our website blog (a science/learning blog with a focus on material science) on you and this topic when we roll it out in a couple of months.
Thank you, Steve. During our research, we discovered many more than currently published on our website. It will be discussed in our upcoming book. One of these discoveries seems quite arbitrary, however, it is very important. The paradigm Stone age, Bronze age, Iron age that is so important to archaeology and history is a natural order. The order is the decomposition rate of these materials. Iron is gone within one or two millenniums, Bronze lasts a few millenniums longer, and Stone remains intact for millions of years. The probability that two patterns coincidentally match, that is the historical paradigm of stone, bronze, iron and the natural decay is only 3.7%. The evidence is simply gone and that is why archaeological has no evidence to assume otherwise. The same counts for the 14C method. Everything older than 60,000 years or that is not composed of organic materials cannot be dated. Archaeology lacks the methods and tools to go deeper into history. Our method seems to have changed that radically.
I am just in awe at the minute. You and your team have done fantastic work.
I have running through my head are the admonition to Solon, the Egyptian Predynastic epochs, The Upanishads and the Yuga’s, The Sumerian Anunnaki lifetime myths, The Great Year, why precession is set in the Temple Stones at Cambodia, Deep Time, Catastrophy in the Younger Dryas… Archaeology is just plain wrong in its assessment of human timelines.
Need to read Hamlets Mill again.
Thank you so, so much.
Thank you for your interesting comment, Alistair. Human history is much more complex than archaeology presents to us. The answer is written in hundreds of ancient structures around the world, not only in orientation but also in godlike craftsmanship. Deep Time is indeed a good word for this very long time frame. Thank you and you’re welcome!
I have just found your YouTube channel and have binge watched nearly all of them. I’m blown away! Your production quality is good and makes your videos easy(er) to comprehend. I thank you for creating these!
I have a couple questions.
1. On one of your repeating conclusion graphics of the various poles, #lV appears twice with no #V, and in one case there is even an un numbered pole shown below the second #IV. Is that in error or can you explain?
2. Do you have any information gathered regarding the world wide occurrence of dolmans, rock Chambers, and balanced megalithic stones?
3. Does your theory help explain the many many elaborate underground “cities” that have been excavated to several levels deep in some cases? As though to hide from something from above…. And could they be related to dolmans and rock Chambers, which have been shown in many cases to also be aligned with solar/seasonal cycles?
Thanks again for your fresh new look at the earth’s many mysteries. I have subscribed and am looking for info on your book.
Thank you for your comment, Bruce. To answer your questions:
1. that was a typo. The second IV below is pole V.
2. Yes, we think to have found answers to that. The answers will be published in one of our later series of books. In short, we think there were real physical connection between continents when dolmans were originally built. A global civilizations when the dinosaurs were still around.
3. There are indeed enormous underground cities found in Turkey, like Derinkuyu. It is unlikely they were built against floods. An underground city when it is flooding is not the best place to be. It could be possible they were hiding for enemies, maybe for barbarian hordes maybe for something from above.
Mario,
Have you ever heard of the Mars, Earth Wars Theory? Its a little known theory that focuses on a possible catastrophic orbit between Earth and Mars that lasted for many millennia. A lot of the math in the theory is a bit too complicated for me to completely grasp but, I would think it right up your alley!
Here’s a link to the authors’ eBook:
http://www.creationism.org/patten/PattenMarsEarthWars/index.htm
The grammar in your videos is really bad. I am reminded from my college days that at graduation engineers said “four years ago I couldn’t spell engineer, now I are one”
I find a lot of your ideas seem to make sense but I cannot deal with the dating and the Anunnaki..
Thank you for the uplift, Ted. English is not my native language. Since the time the videos were made our team has been strengthened with a native alpha to improve the texts on our website. It would be nice to hear which of the many things you actually agree with (which is just an opinion against mathematics) instead of writing down the few things you disagree with, because most of our method converges around the dating method.
Hi Mario,
Your work is really nice and correlated to my findings. Though your work doesn’t explain the reason. A lot of people/writers dedicate the cause to meteors/planets which come back because of their orbit. Though my personal studies dedicate it to the collision from CME’s with interstellar plasma which influences the magnetic direction. The long sun cycle shows that the Earth has the most important crust move after the duration of every half precession. This means that till your V-pole, you’re certainly right, but before the V-pole it’s a total guess. You cannot extrapolate. Moreover, it means that we are sure of a soon important crust move, though one cannot say if it will happen in 5 years or in 200 years. OK, even while I’m 100% convinced, I know that one can easy be mislead, thus any well prooved theory may stay open for investigation.
Hi Kris, thank you for your comment. You are right, we cannot extrapolate beyond pole V and that means that we have shown that earth’s history even over the last 500,000 years is much more complex and dynamic than anyone ever held possible.
You have unfortunately not read all of our work. The reason of crustal deformations are very well explained, and that is the high eccentric orbit of the earth around the sun. High eccentricity means high annual gravitational fluctuations that leads to an oscillating force deforming the crust. When eccentricity is high this oscillating gravitational force can vary up to 30%. Science has never found the reason as to why eccentricity fits one on one over the glaciation graph. We have now discovered why that is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_eccentricity
Wiki science states the solar system specifically has low eccentricity as required for human habitation. Other discovered systems have much higher orbital eccentricity.
Perhaps there is a periodicity associated with a magnetic visiting body that is the actual cause or that this specific orbital path the system is on enters a specific high energy area of unknown cause or a combination of resulting in an expanding Earth which you note.
That might a good observation, Kate. We have theorized a similar ideas; that earth, when it goes in high eccentric orbit, it enters areas of high energy where it absorbs matter that makes the earth grow. Another possibility are micro novas caused by our own sun that emerge the earth in higher energy which causes it to grow.
It is indeed correct in my opinion that habitability of a planet strongly depends on eccentricity. The higher the eccentricity the harder the conditions to survive.
What happens, if there is another crust deformation soon – to the US, our civilization, population, environment?
Hi James, thank you for your comment. The next crustal deformation will not occur in the coming millenniums, and it will not take place overnight, but over a course of many millenniums and slowly destroy our whole civilization. What we will see happening the coming centuries are rising temperatures, the melting of Greenland (sea level rise of around 20 feet), increasing volcanic activity, heavier earthquakes, until the earth’s crust goes over a sort of threshold and becomes unstable. Because Greenland’s ice sheet is gone, the gulf stream won’t be present anymore in that part of the ocean, so the climate in the US will become warmer.
The center of the US, let’s take Kansas City, will slowly shift from a latitude of 39 degrees to a latitude of between 30 to 25 degrees. I expect that during the shift over the many millenniums the US will be a very hostile place to be. The environment will become slowly much hotter, the population will start to migrate and this will result in numerous conflicts. Agriculture will stop to flourish and people become hunters/gatherers again. The population will decrease rapidly due to famine, diseases, and conflicts.
In the far future close to 20,000 AD, after many generations living in small tribes, when the crust is stable again the population will slowly start to grow again. A sort of new native Indians. There will be many narratives of a lost advanced civilization which was our civilization, and of course there will still be the megalithic leftovers of the civilizations before us. I hope this paints for you a picture what we will expect in the far future. We will not experience this in our lifetime, a global nuclear conflict maybe, but not a massive cataclysm.
Thank you, Mario! Extremely interesting review of our future! After reviewing your entire site, I believe it will happen exactly as you’ve stated. It’s difficult for almost all of us to imagine it. Think about it – people dressed in animal skins (again), hunting with bow, arrows, and spears. Flint will become high-value again (money). The planet will start healing; almost sounds exciting! ”Waterworld” Era?
It is indeed an extremely fascinating topic, James. The planet is sort of wounded together with all its inhabitants after this future cataclysm and needs many millenniums to heal. Because Russia will be much Northerly than it is today it will become extremely cold, there will start to develop a new ice sheet on the North Eastern part of Russia. Antarctica will almost remain at its current position, Greenland’s ice sheet was already gone, so the sea levels would be much higher not directly like in “Waterworld”, but yes most of the coastlines as we know today are gone by then. Due to the much intenser cold on Siberia there will start to develop a similar ice sheet on Russia as there was on Greenland, after that happened the sea levels will be similar again as we know today. Greenland will have the same climate as Scandinavia, cold but livable.
Just stumbled on your videos on YouTube, whilst searching for information to support my feeling that Stonehenge & Giza were built by an older, more enlightened civilisation (even started a page on Facebook about ancient pyramids in the hope I could find out more!) Could we be living in the ‘dark ages’ & our forefathers lived in a ‘golden age’ of enlightenment?
Hi Jules, Thank you for your comment. It is an interesting question that we have researched behind the scenes. You might have heard of the Yuga cycles as explained by Yukteswar? According to Yukteswar have these cycles a duration of 24,000 years and influence the consciousness of life on Earth. There are four levels of consciousness Kali (iron), Dwapara (bronze), Tetra (silver), Satya (gold). We just left the Kali Yuga behind us and entered the Dwapara Yuga period. It will still take some 5,000 years of progres before we enter the golden age.
Yes, there were civilizations hundreds of thousands of years ago that lived during the Satya Yugas and were incredibly more advanced than our civilization. But these civilizations lived also during the Kali Yuga comparable as our middle ages. So our forefathers lived in golden ages and also in stone ages.
It is revealing to find this site combining several points of interest from my own investigations and conclusions. CO2 and temperature fluctuation is due to sun, cosmos and nature, only the hoax is man made.
Dating former ancient civilizations by measuring their buildings orientation to north. How several comet impacts may have caused the great flood, the pole shifts, the end of ice age and the lost of civilizations. Continue the great work backing up the theories by the truth of math.
Greetings from Denmark
Finding a solution or finding the solution – that’s the question ?>>!
Hi Mario,
I love your work and it’s fruits!
Could you also share some info about geodetic/true north in relation to those ancient sites? Would be great to see which sites represent galactic knowledge embedded in it’s construction… And is there a way I can contribute?
Love from the Netherlands.
–oneness is the only reality, truth is the only value, and electricity is the only energy. Love is the concept tying everything together.–
Hi Stephan, thank you for your comment! We will share more details in time about which sites relate to which poles. We are careful with the information because people tend to jump to strange conclusions when ideas are shared without deeper knowledge about such sites. You are already contributing by your great comment and great quote. You can also contribute by sharing the website on your social media. Thank you!
Thnx for your reply Mario. For now, sharing has no use;
Those that are interested already now the ice-core studies since Parrenin in 2013 published similar conclusion as yours about Co2 following temperature. And ancient buildings’ alignment to north and it’s precession is already known since the ancient work of Lockyer (middle east) and Posnansky (South America).
ps. As far as I know that “quote” is the fruit of my brain. However, you are free to make it a quote 😉
Hi, I discovered your videos on Youtube and think your work is: Fresh, invigorating, honest, amazing, astounding, as well as entertaining.
Thanks
Thank you for your kind comment, Andrew. Much appreciated.
These are all very interesting. When will the book be published?
Thank you for your comment Arzu. The publishing date is not planned yet.
I’m too amazed to say anything yet that can match what’s going on in my own head about your research, findings, and hard work. It’s great enough that I just wanted to let you, and your group, know that I somehow found it and am sending it to my friends.
And yes, I too want to buy your book, and the others you’ll undoubtedly publish in this series.
This is history in the making; there is nothing I’ve ever read (and I read a lot) that could compare with the sudden impact of this new insight.
It’s a paradigm shift, Bravo!
Thank you for your great comment, Diane. Thumbs up!